Chapter eight: ELTIFs: Safety, Security & Sustainability
What legal protection do ELTIF investors have?
ELTIF investors are protected by five legal layers of protection:
- Supervision. Each ELTIF is authorised by a national authority, in Germany BaFin, in Luxembourg CSSF, in France AMF. It is under constant supervision.
- Regulated fund management. ELTIFs may only be launched by authorised capital management companies or alternative investment fund managers.
- Depository. An independent depositary keeps the Fund assets separate from the assets of the Management Company and controls the use of funds.
- Transparency before purchase. Retail investors will receive a key information document with risk and cost details as well as a prospectus. Regular reports will follow during the term.
- Suitability test. A suitability check in accordance with the MiFID II standard is required for distribution to retail investors. The bank or adviser must clarify whether the product is suitable for the financial situation, experience and investment objectives.
This protection is organised at European and national level and covers supervision, management, custody and distribution. It does not include any guarantee of investment success.
With the ELTIF 2.0 reform, the previous barriers to access have been eliminated, i.e. the minimum investment of EUR 10,000 and the 10% asset limit below EUR 100,000 net assets. The material investor protection through supervision, custodian, transparency and suitability checks has remained unaffected.
The PRIIPs risk class, or SRI for short, shows how high the product-specific risk is. It ranges from 1 for very low risk to 7 for very high risk and is included in each ELTIF’s Key Information Document. Defensive infrastructure and renewable energy strategies tend to be ranked lower than private equity-heavy or mixed private market products. Since 1 July 2025, klimaVest has had a risk class 1 of 7.
Please note: Investor protection for ELTIFs is structural protection, not a promise of success. Losses up to total loss remain possible depending on the product.
Are ELTIFs special assets?
Yes, ELTIFs from German providers are generally special funds. The fund assets are legally separate from the assets of the capital management company and do not belong to the insolvency assets of the management company in the event of an emergency. If the Management Company becomes insolvent, an independent depositary will take over the winding-up of the Fund and the assets may be transferred to another Management Company. The legal basis for this is Sections 92, 99, 100 and 100b of the German Investment Code.
ELTIFs from other EU countries follow a similar logic, but in accordance with the respective national fund law. klimaVest is established as a Luxembourg mutual fund pursuant to Part II of the Luxembourg Law of 2010 and is supervised by the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF). Fund assets and management company are also legally separated here, an independent depositary controls the use of funds. The economic protective effect is therefore the same as for a German special fund, but the formal legal basis is Luxembourg fund law.
Important remarks: The special fund logic protects against the insolvency of the management company. It does not protect against economic losses of the ELTIF itself, i.e. against losses in the value of the holdings, credit defaults or a limited possibility of redemption in stressful periods.
What happens if an ELTIF fails economically?
The economic failure of an ELTIF looks different to the insolvency of an industrial company. It typically manifests itself in three stages for funds: depreciation, limited redemption and, in extreme cases, liquidation of the fund.
In the first stage, the investments or loan receivables in the portfolio lose value. This can be due to depreciation on individual investments, lack of cash flows from infrastructure projects or defaults on corporate loans. The net asset value falls and investors see book losses in their custody account view.
In the second stage, loss of value meets liquidity pressure. If many investors want to redeem at the same time and the fund holds illiquid assets, they cannot be sold in the short term without realising further losses. Semi-liquid ELTIFs can activate a so-called gate in this situation, i.e. temporarily limit or suspend redemptions in order to protect the Fund and the remaining investors.
At the end of 2025, an ELTIF from the German food retail real estate sector temporarily suspended returns after the requests for returns exceeded the contractual threshold in the third quarter. Important: A gate is not an insolvency procedure. In this case, the Fund’s ongoing business operations and asset management continued.
In the third stage, a fund can be wound up in an orderly manner if the economic basis is permanently lost. The assets are then sold over a longer period of time and the proceeds flow back to investors on a pro rata basis. In this constellation, losses up to the total loss of the invested capital are possible, unlike for classic special funds, which are protected against the insolvency of the management company, not against economic losses of the fund itself.
For your own risk assessment, it is therefore important to differentiate between: The insolvency of the Management Company does not legally affect the Fund assets. Economic failure of the ELTIF very well affects the capital deployed. Both scenarios are part of the risk profile of this asset class.
How are ELTIFs classified under SFDR?
Under the EU’s Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR), ELTIFs are classified in three transparency categories:
- Article 6. Products without a designated sustainability objective. They only need to disclose whether and how sustainability risks are included in investment decisions.
- Article 8. Products that promote environmental or social characteristics. Also called “light green” products.
- Article 9. Products with a specific sustainable investment objective. Also called “dark green” products.
Important remarks: Articles 8 and 9 are not state labels but transparency categories. They oblige providers to disclose and make sustainability characteristics traceable. However, they do not guarantee that a fund will actually be as green as its label suggests.
In the current market, the “green” categories clearly predominate. Of the 113 ELTIFs newly launched in 2025, around half rely on an ESG or sustainability reference in accordance with Article 8 or Article 9 of the SFDR. Which asset class an ELTIF covers greatly influences the classification: Private debt and private equity ELTIFs are more commonly classified under Article 6 without an explicit sustainability reference, while infrastructure and renewable strategies are predominantly classified under Article 8 or Article 9.
It should be noted that the SFDR is currently being reformed. On 20 November 2025, the EU Commission presented a proposal to replace the current categories of Article 8 and Article 9 with three new ones: Sustainable, Transition and ESG Basics. Applicability is expected from 2028.
Thus, the SFDR classification is an initial filter, but not evidence of the actual sustainability of a fund. How resilient an Article 8 or Article 9 label is depends on the specific investment objective, the portfolio and the quality of the report.
As a proven example of an Article 9 product: klimaVest pursues the investment objective of making a positive, measurable contribution to the environmental objectives of the EU Taxonomy. Disclosure under Article 10 SFDR requires at least 80% of investments to be sustainable and pursue only environmental objectives.
Are ELTIFs sustainable?
ELTIFs are not sustainable as a class. Only individual ELTIFs whose investment objective, SFDR classification and actual portfolio also support this are sustainable. The ELTIF envelope itself is a regulatory vehicle, not a sustainability promise.
In the current market, the picture is divided into two parts. Approximately half of the ELTIFs newly launched in 2025 have an ESG reference in accordance with SFDR Article 8 or 9. The other half either has no sustainability reference or is missing information about it. Even within the “green” categories, the actual sustainability can be stressed differently.
The analyst Morningstar points out in his report "The State of ELTIFs 2026" that the market boom makes conflicts of objectives visible. Liquidity reserves, leverage, high fees and valuation issues can overwrite the sustainable and stable narrative. In other words: A “green” label does not automatically mean that every euro in the fund actually benefits the climate.
Those who specifically want to invest in sustainable ELTIFs should check four pieces of evidence:
- Disclosure under Article 10 SFDR. This includes the specific investment objective and the proportion of assets that must be sustainable.
- Periodic sustainability report. Shows what was actually implemented in the portfolio, not just what was announced.
- EU Taxonomy Ratio. Indicates the proportion of the portfolio that meets the EU criteria for environmentally sustainable economic activity.
- Exclusion criteria. Which sectors or technologies the fund explicitly excludes.
As an example: klimaVest is launched as an Article 9 product with a focus on renewable energies, electricity grids and storage. The Article 10 disclosure stipulates that at least 80% of investments must be sustainable and pursue only environmental objectives. Each investment undergoes impact and ESG due diligence as well as so-called DNSH checks, i.e. checks whether the investment does not significantly harm other environmental objectives. A supplementary self-commitment generally excludes investments in nuclear power and natural gas, with the strict exception of hydrogen-relevant gas networks.
What role does the EU Taxonomy play for ELTIFs?
The EU Taxonomy is a classification system of the European Union that defines which economic activities are considered environmentally sustainable. For ELTIFs, it becomes relevant whenever a product advertises with environmental objectives or characteristics, i.e. typically for ELTIFs under Article 8 or Article 9 of the SFDR. These must disclose the proportion of taxonomy-aligned investments in the portfolio. Non-environmentally related ELTIFs use a negative rate which clarifies that the underlying investments do not take into account the EU criteria for environmentally sustainable activities.
For investors, the taxonomy ratio is a more concrete test stone than general ESG language because it is based on an EU-wide uniform definition. It makes the ecological substance of a portfolio measurable and is basically comparable across several providers.
For example, klimaVest reports a taxonomy alignment rate of 92.91 percent for the 2024/2025 financial year. In previous years, the figures were 100 percent (2023/2024), 100 percent (2022/2023) and 55.6 percent (2021/2022). Among other things, the Provider justifies the change compared to previous years with an adjusted calculation since July 2025. The proportion of sustainable environmental investments that are not taxonomy-aligned is reported as 0 percent.
For your own assessment, this means: The taxonomy ratio is included in the annual report or periodic SFDR disclosure of each environmentally related ELTIF. It is a robust indicator, but should be read in the context of multi-year comparisons with a view to explained methodological guidance.